Research with human subjects has long been controversial because of the conflicts that often arise between promoting scientific knowledge and protecting the rights and welfare of subjects. Twenty-five years ago the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research addressed these conflicts. The result was the Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidance for Research Involving Human Subjects, a report that identified foundational principles for ethical research with human subjects: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice.
Since the publication of Belmont, these three principles have greatly influenced discussions of research with human subjects. While they are often regarded as the single-most influential set of guidelines for biomedical research and practice in the United States (and other parts of the world), not everyone agrees that they provide adequate guidance. Belmont Revisited brings together a stellar group of scholars in bioethics to revisit the findings of that original report. Their responses constitute a broad overview of the development of the Belmont Report and the extent of its influence, especially on governmental commissions, as well as an assessment of its virtues and shortcomings.
Belmont Revisited looks back to reexamine the creation and influence of the Belmont Report, and also looks forward to the future of research—with a strong call to rethink how institutions and investigators can conduct research more ethically.
Table of Contents
Introduction
PART I: BACKGROUND AND ORIGINS OF THE BELMONT REPORT
1. On the Origins and Future of the Belmont Report
Albert R. Jonsen
2. The Origins and Evolution of the Belmont Report
Tom L. Beauchamp
PART II: THE BELMONT PRINCIPLES: INFLUENCE & APPLICATION
3. The Dog in the Night-Time: Or the Curious Relationship of the Belmont Report and the President's Commission
Alexander M. Capron
4. Beyond Belmont: Trust, Openness, and the Work of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments
Ruth R. Faden, Anna Mastroianni, and Jeffrey P. Kahn
5. Relating to History: The Influence of the National Commission and Its Belmont Report on the National Bioethics Advisory Commission
Harold T. Shapiro and Eric M. Meslin
6. The Principles of the Belmont Report: How Have Respect for Persons, Beneficence, and Justice Been Applied in Clinical Medicine?
Eric J. Cassell
Part III: THE BELMONT PRINCIPLES: POSSIBILITIES, LIMITATIONS, AND UNRESOLVED QUESTIONS
7. We Sure We Are Older But Are We Wiser?
Karen Lebacqz
8. Toward a More Robust Autonomy: Revisiting the Belmont Report
Larry R. Churchill
9. The National Commission's Ethical Principles With Special Attention to Beneficence
Robert J. Levine
10. Justice beyond Belmont
Patricia A. King
11. Belmont Revisited Through a Feminist Lens
Susan Sherwin
12. Protecting Communities in Research: From a New Principle to Rational Protections
Ezekiel J. Emanuel and Charles Weijer
13. Ranking, Balancing, or Simultaneity: Resolving Conflicts Among the Belmont Principles
Robert M. Veatch
14. Specifying, Balancing, and Interpreting Bioethical Principles
Henry S. Richardson
15. Max Weber Meets the Belmont Report: Toward a Sociological Interpretation of Principlism
John H. Evans
Epilogue: Looking Back to Look Forward
James F. Childress
Appendix: The Belmont Report
Contributors
Index
Reviews
"The editors . . . have done an exemplary job of organizing 15 [chapters] into an unusually cohesive whole."—New England Journal of Medicine
"Serves as a valuable document of the ways interpretation and application of the Belmont principles have evolved."—JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association)
"There can be little doubt that the 1979 Belmont Report was a key document in the development of national policy on human subject research. Its history and its importance are too little known. This book, a splendid and probing collection about the Report, is an important study, readable and interesting. Human subject research remains a difficult and contentious area. This book helps to show why, and will help to bring greater light to the ongoing debate."—Daniel Callahan, director of international programs, The Hastings Center
"Twenty-five years after publication, the Belmont Report and the principles it espoused remain the most influential events in biomedical research worldwide. These retrospective reflections, by participants in the report’s formulations, offer frank and updated insights into the genesis and evolution of the report—and especially of its three famous principles. Given today’s renewed scrutiny of human subject research, these essays will interest clinical investigators, policymakers, legislators and the general public."—Edmund D. Pellegrino, MD, Chair, President's Council on Bioethics, 2005-2009, and professor emeritus of medicine and medical ethics, Center for Clinical Bioethics, Georgetown University Medical Center
Contributors
Tom L. Beauchamp Alexander M. Capron Eric J. Cassell James F. Childress Larry R. Churchill Ezekiel J. Emanuel John H. Evans Ruth R. Faden Albert R. Jonsen Jeffrey P. Kahn Patricia A. King Karen Lebacqz Robert J. Levine Anna Mastroianni Eric M. Meslin Henry S. Richardson Harold T. Shapiro Susan Sherwin Robert M. Veatch Charles Weijer
About the Author
James F. Childress is the John Allen Hollingsworth Professor of Ethics at the University of Virginia.
Eric M. Meslin is director of the Indiana University Center for Bioethics.
Harold T. Shapiro is president emeritus, Princeton University and a professor of economics and public affairs in the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs.
